Speech Activities by Age

How to do an oral motor warm-up before speech practice

A step-by-step guide to oral motor warm-ups before speech practice: what exercises work, how long they take, and what the research actually says.

Parent and child doing lip movement exercises together on a sunny floor
Parent and child doing lip movement exercises together on a sunny floor

Last updated 2026-07-11

An oral motor warm-up is a short run of mouth movements done right before speech practice: some lip stretches, tongue lateralization, a bit of blowing or humming. Three to five minutes is plenty. The research behind these exercises is genuinely mixed, so what actually matters is getting into real sound practice within the first minute, not the warm-up itself.

Think of it the way a runner shakes out before a race. It's a short set of nonspeech movements for the lips, tongue, jaw, cheeks, and soft palate. The muscles used in speech are among the fastest and most precise in the human body, and priming them before asking a child to hit a tricky sound can smooth out the first few minutes of practice.

Speech-language pathologists have used these exercises for decades, but the evidence tells a different story. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association says the research on nonspeech oral motor exercises as a standalone treatment for speech sound disorders is not strong.[1] A warm-up that never connects to actual speech is mostly wasted time. The version that helps is the one where you move fast, within the first 60 seconds, into the target sounds or words the child is working on. Movement wakes up awareness; speech is what locks in the skill.

For kids with childhood apraxia of speech, sensory differences, or low oral muscle tone, a short warm-up can also do a regulating job. It signals that speech time is starting, softens tactile defensiveness around the mouth, and can calm a child before an activity that feels hard. That's a real benefit, even when it isn't retraining a single motor plan.

Three to five minutes is the ceiling for most children, and two minutes is plenty if a child is already engaged and ready to go. Longer isn't better: stretch a warm-up to ten minutes and you've eaten into the practice time that actually moves progress. Motor learning research in speech points the same direction every time: high repetitions of the target itself (the sounds, words, phrases) drive change, not extended prep.[2] A 30-minute session with 20 minutes of tongue waggles and 10 minutes of target words will teach less than the reverse. For toddlers and preschoolers, keep it to two minutes since their attention window is short and you want them entering sound practice while they're still fresh. School-age kids can handle three to five minutes, which can double as a transition ritual that settles them into the work.

Here's a sequence you can use at home. You don't need all of these every session: pick four or five that match what your child can do and the sounds you're targeting right after.

Lip exercises

Tongue exercises

Jaw exercises

Cheek and breath exercises

ExerciseMuscles targetedSounds it primesAge range it works well for
Lip smile-to-OOrbicularis oris/p/, /b/, /m/, /w/2 years and up
Tongue tip tapsTip elevators/t/, /d/, /n/, /l/3 years and up
Tongue lateralizationTransverse tongue/s/, /z/, /sh/3 years and up
Cheek puffBuccinator, soft palate/p/, /b/, fricatives2 years and up
Straw bubblesLips, breath supportAll stops and fricatives18 months and up
Sustained humVocal folds, lipsAll voiced sounds2 years and up
Jaw open-closeMasseter, pterygoidVowels, open syllables3 years and up

The jump from warm-up to practice should be instant and obvious. Say something like, "Great, now let's try the /t/ sound in 'top'" within 30 seconds of the last exercise. Don't let the momentum die.

This is the fight parents and therapists have most often, and the honest answer is that the evidence depends on what you're using the exercises for. A 2008 study in Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools by Gregory Lof and Maggie Watson surveyed 537 speech-language pathologists and found that a large majority used nonspeech oral motor exercises even though research support for remediating speech sound disorders was weak.[3] That's a wide gap between what clinicians do and what the studies show.

ASHA's technical report on childhood apraxia of speech is direct about the primary approach. In its words, "There is no current evidence" supporting nonspeech oral motor exercises as a treatment that changes speech production in CAS, and it recommends speech-motor approaches instead.[4] If your child has apraxia of speech, you want a method like DTTC (Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing) or the Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme at the center of treatment, not a warm-up routine.[9]

Here's where oral motor work does earn its keep: for children with low oral tone, drooling, or feeding and swallowing difficulties, targeted oral motor intervention shows clearer benefit.[5] And for sensory-seeking kids, or kids with real tactile sensitivity around the mouth, a short sensory prep can cut avoidance and lift engagement. That's a practical payoff even when the direct transfer to speech sounds is fuzzy. Use a warm-up as a short bridge into speech practice, never as the treatment itself. If a therapist spends most of a session on oral motor exercises and barely touches sound production, ask why.

SLP oral motor exercise use vs. research support (by exercise type) Percentage of surveyed SLPs reporting use of nonspeech oral motor exercises, from Lof & Watson 2008 (n=537) Tongue exercises 85% Lip exercises 82% Jaw exercises 74% Blowing exercises 71% Cheek/breath exercises 65% Source: Lof & Watson, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2008

What if your child won't sit still for it?

Toddlers will not sit still and do tongue exercises on command, and that's normal, not a problem to fix. The move with very young children is to hide the warm-up inside play. Blowing real soap bubbles builds the same lip rounding and breath control as any formal blowing drill. Making animal sounds together does the work of structured tongue exercises. Pretending to be a frog with a long tongue gets lateralization. A wind-up toy the child blows across a table beats five minutes of instruction.

For kids with sensory sensitivity around the mouth, start with tools instead of your fingers. A vibrating Z-vibe or an Ark Grabber can introduce sensation gently, and you work outward from what the child tolerates. Never force a tool or your fingers near a child's mouth.

Some children do better with a visual schedule that shows the steps in pictures, especially autistic kids, who tend to settle when they can see what's coming and how long it lasts.[6] A three-picture sequence (bubbles, tongue waggle, hum) gives a clear start and finish, which lowers resistance.

If you're doing early intervention at home, keep the whole routine under two minutes and make it feel like the start of play rather than the start of work. The mood your child carries into the first sounds of a session matters a lot.[8]

What tools or props make oral motor warm-ups easier?

You don't need to buy anything for most of this. The good warm-up activities use things you already own, though a few tools earn their place if your child has real oral sensory issues or low tone.

Start with what's free. Bubble wands build lip rounding and breath control in a way kids actually enjoy. Straws work too: drinking thick liquids through a narrow straw builds lip strength, and blowing a cotton ball across a table through a straw turns the same skill into a game. A mirror gives a child watching their own mouth move a kind of feedback no app fully matches, and whistles or kazoos produce sustained voicing and breath control without any instruction needed.

A couple of low-cost tools are worth considering for the right child. Chewy tubes and Ark Grabbers (roughly $8 to $15 each) give kids who chew on clothing or need oral input before they can focus a safe outlet. Vibrating tools like the Z-vibe (around $30 to $40) give the tongue and lips feedback that helps some children with sensory differences find where sounds are made, though it's worth checking with your SLP before buying one.

Two things to skip: tongue depressors used passively (a child who has something held against their tongue is tolerating pressure, not building motor control), and the pricey "oral motor kits" sold online, which are mostly overpriced bundles of things you can buy separately or improvise at home.

If you're working with a provider through online speech therapy, ask them to walk you through tool use on video so your positioning is right.

Should the warm-up be different for a child with autism?

It might look different, but the logic holds: keep it short and sensory-friendly, then move straight into real speech targets.

For autistic children, predictability carries a lot of weight. A warm-up done the same way each session becomes a reliable signal that speech practice is starting, which softens transition anxiety. Some kids find it genuinely regulating, especially when it includes input like jaw exercises or chewing before the verbal demands land.

Sensory differences are common in autism, and many autistic kids are hypersensitive around the mouth, which makes touch-based exercises feel aversive.[7] In that case, start with blowing (no touch), move to humming (vibration the child controls), then slowly bring in mirror-based tongue movements the child does on their own. Never use physical prompting around the face without clear, ongoing consent from the child.

Other autistic kids seek sensory input and love oral stimulation. They may respond better to chewy or vibrating tools than to verbal instruction. This is one spot where knowing your own child's sensory profile beats any generic protocol.

For autistic children who use AAC, the warm-up still applies. If a child communicates with a device but is also working on verbal approximations or functional speech sounds, the same lip and tongue prep fits, and our piece on AAC devices covers how speech and AAC work side by side. A child getting autism spectrum speech therapy should have their SLP shape the warm-up to that child's sensory profile rather than follow a one-size routine.

What's the right order for a warm-up before speech practice?

Order matters because you're building from general awareness to specific readiness: start broad, end precise, then hit the target sound.

A good sequence moves like this: breath and voice first (humming, blowing, sustained sounds), then jaw and cheek movements (open-close, cheek puffs), then lip movements (smile-to-O, lip press, raspberries), then tongue movements starting broad (lateralization, circles) and ending precise (tongue tip taps to the alveolar ridge), and finally an immediate move into target sounds or words.

That order exists because breath support sits under all speech, and jaw stability supports lip and tongue movement. You don't want to open with fine tongue tip work on a jaw that hasn't moved yet.

For a child working on /s/, end with tongue lateralization and tongue tip taps, then say, "Great. Now let's try 'sun'." For a child working on /p/ and /b/, end with cheek puffs and lip press, then jump straight to words. Match the last exercise to the first sound of practice every single time.

How do you know if the warm-up is actually helping?

Track two things: how easily the child produces the first few target words of each session, and how long it takes them to settle into the work.

If a child usually needs several failed tries before a clean target sound at the start of a session, and that number drops over a few weeks, the warm-up is probably priming the system. If nothing changes, it may not be doing much, and it's worth testing what happens when you shorten or skip it.

Nobody has good systematic data on this exact question. The closest research compares sessions with and without oral motor prep, but most studies look at long-term outcomes rather than session-by-session ease of getting started. So clinically, practitioners watch whether a child's first productions come out cleaner after a warm-up, which is really a judgment call made by caregivers and SLPs watching the same child over time.

Talk to your child's speech therapist about keeping a simple log: a note at the start of each session on how many tries it took to get the first clear target sound. Over eight to twelve sessions, a pattern usually shows up.

If you use an app like Little Words for short daily practice at home, run a two-minute warm-up before the app's activities. Take the start quiz to get a practice plan matched to your child's current sounds.

Can a parent run an oral motor warm-up without a speech therapist present?

Yes, and parents run these at home every day. It's one of the higher-value things a family can do between therapy sessions.

You don't need special training for lip stretches, tongue waggles, or blowing bubbles. What you need is guidance from your child's SLP on which exercises match the sounds you're targeting and what to watch for. Ask the therapist to show you the sequence once, on video or in person, then copy it at home.

A few cautions apply. Don't force any movement: if a child resists, back off and try something else. Don't run past five minutes, since parents naturally want to do more when they feel like they're helping, and here more is genuinely not better. And don't let the warm-up replace actual sound practice: the movement only counts as a bridge.

If you're doing home practice with no professional guidance at all, keep the exercises gentle and voluntary, skip anything that goes in the mouth (chewy tubes, vibrators) unless a professional recommended it, and stick to blowing and mirroring activities that carry almost no risk.

Children who've had early intervention services and are moving to home-based practice are often good candidates for a structured home warm-up, especially when the SLP hands off a written protocol.[8]

What common mistakes should parents avoid during oral motor warm-ups?

The biggest one is letting the warm-up become the whole session. If you're spending ten minutes on mouth exercises and two minutes on real words, flip that ratio.

Second: picking exercises that don't connect to the target sounds. Blowing is fun, but if a child is working on /k/ and /g/, sounds that need tongue back elevation rather than lip strength, blowing prep isn't priming much that's relevant. Ask your SLP which exercises pair with which sounds.

Third: physical prompting without the child's clear tolerance. Pressing a finger on the tongue to show position can help when a child is calm and willing, but the second they turn away, resist, or show distress, stop. Forced oral contact in a child with sensory sensitivity can build an aversion that takes weeks to undo.

Fourth: doing the warm-up in a loud, busy room. Speech practice, prep included, works better in a calm, low-distraction space, so turn off the TV and sit at a table or on the floor facing each other.

Fifth: doing it inconsistently. A brief warm-up every day for two weeks builds more than one long session a week, since motor learning in speech follows a frequency and repetition model.[2] Short and frequent beats long and occasional nearly every time.

Frequently asked questions

How many reps should each exercise get?

Five to ten is the range most clinicians work with for a given movement. Pushing past ten of the same exercise in one sitting rarely adds anything and just wears the muscles out. The goal is awareness and activation, not fatigue, so if your child's movements get sloppy or they lose interest after five reps, that's a fine place to stop.

What age can you start?

Playful oral activities, bubbles, animal sounds, that sort of thing, can start around 18 months. Structured warm-up sequences with deliberate reps tend to work better from around age three, once a child can follow a simple two-step direction. Go by what the child can actually do rather than the age on their birth certificate. [10]

Does this help with drooling?

Maybe, though the evidence is thin. Drooling usually has more to do with low oral awareness, a weak lip seal, or infrequent swallowing than with muscle weakness itself. Exercises that build lip closure, like cheek puffs or lip press drills, may help some kids. If drooling is a real concern, a speech-language pathologist trained in feeding and swallowing can pin down the actual cause and suggest exercises aimed at it. [5]

Warm-up versus oral motor therapy: what's the difference?

Oral motor therapy is a full treatment approach, often running many sessions, aimed at specific structural or functional problems in the mouth. A warm-up is just the two to five minutes before speech practice starts. It borrows a few exercises from that therapy world, but it isn't treatment by itself. Whether a child needs actual oral motor therapy is something an SLP decides after evaluating them, not a call to make at home.

What about low muscle tone (hypotonia)?

Warm-ups can be one piece of a larger plan. Kids with hypotonia often have reduced oral endurance and awareness, and graded resistance work, tongue push drills or chewing on the right kind of chewy tool, may build strength over time. But when hypotonia is affecting speech, it usually calls for a broader SLP plan, often alongside occupational therapy. A warm-up alone won't cover it.

Should I try a vibrating tool like a Z-vibe at home?

Only if your child's SLP recommended it and showed you exactly how to use it. These tools can help kids with low sensory awareness, but used the wrong way they can overstimulate a child or create an aversion instead. They run about $30 to $40 from therapy supply sites, but the price isn't really the issue: get guidance first, especially with younger children or kids who react strongly to sensory input.

Does this help with childhood apraxia of speech?

The evidence doesn't support oral motor exercises as a primary treatment for CAS. ASHA points instead to speech-motor approaches built on high-repetition sound and syllable practice. A short warm-up, a minute or two, might help a child with CAS ease into a session, but most of the time should go toward actual speech-motor work using approaches like DTTC. Talk to a specialist if your child has CAS. [4] [9]

Can we do this every day?

Yes, and daily is actually ideal, since speech motor learning depends heavily on how often you practice. A two-to-three minute warm-up followed by ten to fifteen minutes of home practice is a routine most families can keep up. The mistake to avoid is doing only the warm-up and skipping the sound practice itself. Think of the warm-up as the appetizer and the actual word and sound work as the meal. [2]

Does this work for adults too?

Same principles apply. Adults recovering from stroke or traumatic brain injury, or adults with dysarthria, may benefit from some oral motor prep before speech practice. The evidence is similarly mixed, and the same rule holds: keep it short and move quickly into real speech targets. An SLP who specializes in adult neurological communication disorders should be the one designing those exercises.

My child hates doing these. Now what?

Disguise them. Blowing bubbles, playing a kazoo, making animal noises, or racing a cotton ball across the table with a puff of air do the same priming work without looking like an exercise. What matters clinically is activating the mouth and building sensory awareness, and how you get there can be entirely playful. If your child resists, change the format, not the goal.

Is this like stretching before a workout?

Sort of, but the comparison only goes so far. Stretching before exercise has stronger research behind it than oral motor warm-ups do for speech. A better comparison might be a musician warming up their fingers: it's about waking up neural pathways and getting ready, not preventing injury. The value is in the transition from rest into focused motor work, not in the exercises producing big effects on their own.

Same warm-up every time, or should we mix it up?

Keep the overall structure consistent, but rotate individual exercises now and then so things don't go stale. Many children, autistic children especially, do better with a predictable routine, so a sequence like breath, jaw, lips, tongue, then into sounds can stay fixed while the specific exercises within each step change. The one part that should always shift is the final exercise, since that needs to connect to whatever sounds you're targeting that day.

Sources

  1. ASHA, Speech Sound Disorders and Oral Motor Treatment resources: ASHA notes that research support for nonspeech oral motor exercises as standalone treatment for speech sound disorders is limited
  2. Maas et al., 'Principles of Motor Learning in Treatment of Motor Speech Disorders,' American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2008: Motor learning research shows high-repetition practice of target behaviors drives speech progress more than preparatory exercises
  3. Lof & Watson, 'A nationwide survey of nonspeech oral motor exercise use,' Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2008: A large majority of the 537 surveyed SLPs reported using nonspeech oral motor exercises despite limited research support for speech sound disorder remediation
  4. ASHA Technical Report: Childhood Apraxia of Speech (2007): ASHA states there is no current evidence supporting nonspeech oral motor exercises as a primary approach that changes speech production in childhood apraxia of speech
  5. American Academy of Pediatrics resources on feeding and oral motor concerns: Oral motor intervention shows clearer benefit for children with feeding, swallowing difficulties, or low oral tone than for speech sound production alone
  6. National Autism Center, National Standards Project: Visual schedules are established supports for autistic children, improving transition compliance and reducing anxiety around activity changes
  7. ASHA, Autism Spectrum Disorder Practice Portal: Sensory hypersensitivity around the oral region is common in autism and affects tolerance of touch-based oral motor exercises
  8. ASHA, Early Intervention Practice Portal: Early intervention speech services support home-based practice carry-over, including structured parent-led routines
  9. Strand et al., 'Treatment of Severe Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Treatment Efficacy Study,' Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2006: DTTC is a speech-motor treatment approach with evidence support for childhood apraxia of speech, contrasting with oral motor exercise approaches
  10. CDC, Learn the Signs. Act Early. Developmental Milestones: Typical speech-motor development milestones inform when and how structured oral motor activities are age-appropriate
Little Words is a talk-with-Buddy app built for kids like yours.

Buddy is a voice-first speech companion your child actually talks to, made for late talkers and neurodivergent kids. It is free to download and takes 30 seconds to try.

See what Buddy can door download on the App Store