Speech Activities by Age

10-Minute Speech Practice That Doesn't Require Sitting Still

If you searched for speech practice for toddlers, this page gives you the parent-level answer: what the concern usually means, what.

Parent signing to toddler during morning snack using total communication approach

Last updated 2026-07-11

TL;DR

Total communication means using every available channel at once: spoken words, signs, pictures, gestures, facial expression, and AAC devices. Research consistently shows that adding these supports does not slow speech development and often speeds it up. Any child who struggles to communicate verbally can benefit, including late talkers, autistic children, and kids with apraxia.

What is the total communication approach?

Total communication is the practice of pairing spoken language with at least one other mode of communication at the same time. You might say "more" while signing MORE and pointing to a snack. You might speak a word while showing a picture card. You might use a speech-generating device alongside natural speech. The goal is to give a child every possible route to understanding and expressing language right now, instead of waiting for speech to arrive on its own.

The term came out of deaf education in the late 1960s, but speech-language pathologists have applied it broadly to any child whose verbal output lags behind their apparent comprehension or communicative intent. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) describes this as a "multimodal" approach and considers it within the scope of evidence-based practice for children with complex communication needs [1].

Let me be precise about what total communication is not. It is not a single therapy program with a branded curriculum. It is a philosophy: meet the child where they are, use everything available, and do not gatekeep communication behind the ability to speak. Different clinicians and families run it differently, and that flexibility is a feature, not a flaw.

Does using signs or pictures slow down speech development?

This is the question parents ask most, and the research answer is no. The fear that adding signs or AAC will make a child "lazy" about talking is understandable. It does not hold up in the data.

A widely cited 2006 systematic review by Millar, Light, and Schlosser examined studies of AAC use in children with developmental disabilities and found no evidence that AAC intervention reduced speech production. In several cases speech output increased after AAC was introduced [2]. A later meta-analysis by Schlosser and Wendt, covering 27 studies, reached the same conclusion: AAC does not suppress speech, and in a subset of studies it appeared to help it along [3].

The mechanism makes intuitive sense. A child who can communicate is a child who is less frustrated, and a less frustrated child engages more. More engagement means more language exposure. More language exposure builds more language. Taking away the pressure to produce speech correctly on the first try often frees children to attempt it more, not less.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) states that augmentative and alternative communication systems should be introduced early, and that waiting for a child to "be ready" for AAC is not supported by evidence [4]. Speech does not have to be present before other modes are offered.

Which children benefit most from total communication?

Total communication is used most often with children who have a gap between what they seem to understand and what they can say. That covers a broad group.

Late talkers, children who have fewer than 50 words by 24 months or no two-word combinations by 30 months, are a common starting point [5]. Many late talkers catch up on their own. Those who do not, sometimes called "late bloomers who don't bloom," are good candidates for multimodal support early rather than late.

Autistic children often have uneven language profiles: rich receptive vocabulary alongside minimal expressive speech, or verbal scripts that work more as self-regulation than communication. Total communication meets both patterns. See our guide to autism spectrum speech therapy for more on the specific approaches used.

Children with childhood apraxia of speech benefit a lot, because apraxia is a motor planning disorder, not a language comprehension problem. The child knows what they want to say but the motor pathway is unreliable. Signs and AAC give a dependable output channel while motor speech therapy builds the verbal route. ASHA specifically lists multimodal communication as a recommended support for CAS [6].

Children with Down syndrome, cerebral palsy, and other conditions that affect oral motor control are also well-served. And some late talkers with no diagnosis at all simply respond faster when the input arrives through more than one sensory channel at once.

What the evidence says about AAC and speech development Key findings from peer-reviewed research on total communication and AAC 27 Studies showing AAC did NOT reduce speech 11 Studies showing speech incr… after AAC introduction (sub… 14 PECS studies showing benefit for communication initiation 3 Months: typical range before a child begins using Source: Schlosser & Wendt 2008 (JSLHR); Millar, Light & Schlosser 2006 (JSLHR); Flippin et al. 2010 (AJSLP)

What modes are included in total communication?

There is no fixed list, but the modes most often combined are:

Spoken language. Always present. The point of total communication is to support speech, not replace it.

Manual signs. Baby sign language (often ASL-based) and programs like Makaton use simplified, consistent hand signs. Signs have a motor component that may help encode words in memory. They are visible and can be produced more slowly than speech, which may help children with processing delays. Unlike full ASL, the signs used in total communication programs pair with spoken words rather than stand alone as a language.

Picture symbols and visual supports. These range from real photographs to line-drawing symbol systems like PCS (Picture Communication Symbols) and PECS (Picture Exchange Communication System). PECS was developed by Bondy and Frost and has a reasonably strong evidence base for starting communication in minimally verbal children [7].

Speech-generating devices (SGDs) and AAC apps. These can be low-tech (a simple button that plays a recorded word) or high-tech (a tablet-based system with thousands of vocabulary items organized by semantic category). For more on how these work, see our overview of aac devices.

Gestures and body language. Pointing, reaching, nodding, showing. These are natural, require no equipment, and are powerful communicative acts that deserve to be recognized and answered.

Facial expression and proximity. These are always on and always communicating. Total communication means being intentional about your own face and body when you talk to a child.

In practice, a family using total communication might use signs for 20 to 30 high-frequency words, keep a small picture board on the fridge for meal requests, and use a simple AAC app during play.

How is total communication different from AAC alone?

AAC (augmentative and alternative communication) refers specifically to the tools: devices, picture boards, sign systems. Total communication is the broader approach that says you use all of those tools alongside natural speech at the same time, without ranking one mode above another.

You can use AAC without a total communication philosophy. Some older intervention models introduced AAC as a fallback only after speech attempts failed, or restricted its use to specific settings. Total communication rejects that restriction. Every mode is available at every moment.

You can also practice total communication without any formal AAC device. A parent who consistently signs AND speaks to their late talker, who also uses gesture and keeps pictures available, is doing total communication with nothing plugged in.

The practical difference shows up at the dinner table. Total communication means that when your child reaches toward the juice, you name it, sign it, maybe show the picture card, and hand it over while celebrating that they told you something. You are not waiting for them to say the word before you respond.

How do you start total communication at home without a therapist?

You do not need a therapist to begin, though having one guide the setup helps a lot. Here is a realistic starting framework.

First, pick 10 to 20 words that matter most to your child right now. Think about what they want most often: favorite foods, "more," "no," "help," names of people and pets, preferred toys. Frequency and motivation drive acquisition faster than any other factor.

Second, learn the signs for those words. Free ASL dictionaries like Handspeak and the ASL dictionary at Lifeprint (run by Dr. Bill Vicars at Sacramento State) are reliable starting points. You do not need to be fluent. You need to be consistent.

Third, always pair the sign with the spoken word. Say the word clearly, sign it at the same time, and do this every single time. Inconsistency is the main reason home programs stall.

Fourth, respond to any communicative attempt, however imperfect. If your child reaches, points, makes a sound, or approximates a sign, respond as if it were a perfect message. That teaches the deepest lesson of all: communication works.

Fifth, add visual supports gradually. A simple picture schedule for the morning routine lowers anxiety and builds comprehension vocabulary without requiring anyone to speak.

If your child is older, has more complex needs, or is not making progress after a few months, that is the signal to connect with a licensed speech-language pathologist who can do a full assessment and build a more targeted plan. Early intervention services for children under 3 are free in the United States under IDEA Part C [8].

What does a speech therapist actually do with total communication?

A speech-language pathologist (SLP) who uses total communication does more than hand you a sign chart. The assessment comes first. The SLP looks at the child's comprehension, motor abilities, sensory profile, and what motivates them. Then they design a vocabulary set and pick modes that fit the child's physical and cognitive access.

For a toddler with strong motor skills, signs might be the main added mode. For a child with low muscle tone who finds signing hard, a picture-based or device-based system might lead. For a child with apraxia of speech, the SLP will typically combine specific motor speech therapy with steady, well-organized AAC support.

In sessions, the SLP models. They use the same signs and devices they are asking the child to use. This is called aided language stimulation, or "modeling," and it is one of the most consistent findings in AAC research: children need to see an adult using the system before they use it themselves [9].

The SLP also coaches you. The most effective total communication programs are the ones where the family carries the approach into daily life. Therapy runs 30 to 60 minutes once or twice a week. Your child is awake for far more hours than that, and what happens at the dinner table and the playground matters more in total than what happens in the clinic.

If you cannot get to in-person therapy, online speech therapy via telehealth is a real and increasingly well-researched option. ASHA has published guidance supporting telepractice for pediatric speech-language services, and several states have expanded Medicaid coverage for it [1].

What does research say about total communication outcomes?

The evidence base is stronger in some areas than others, and it helps to be honest about that.

For AAC specifically, the research is solid. The Schlosser and Wendt meta-analysis mentioned above found positive effects on communication outcomes across a range of populations [3]. A review of PECS for autism by Flippin, Reszka, and Watson found evidence of benefit for communication initiation, though the effects on spoken language were variable [7].

For manual signs combined with speech in late talkers without autism, the evidence is thinner. There are fewer randomized trials, partly because it is ethically messy to withhold communication support from a control group of toddlers. The closest thing to a consensus lives in expert guidelines: ASHA, the AAP, and the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC) all recommend early multimodal support rather than watchful waiting [1][4].

Long-term outcome data are sparse. Nobody has good population-level data on whether children who start total communication at 18 months talk more at age 5 than those who started at 30 months. The closest evidence points to earlier being better, which fits what we know about neuroplasticity in early language development [10].

Here is what the data do support clearly. Total communication does no harm. Most children can learn to use at least one additional mode reliably. And combining modes raises the number of successful communicative exchanges per day, which is a meaningful outcome on its own, no matter what happens to speech production.

What are the most common mistakes parents make with total communication?

Starting with too many words is the most common one. Parents get a sign dictionary and try to sign everything at once. The child gets overwhelmed, the parent gets inconsistent, and the whole thing fades by week three. Start with 10 to 15 words. Master those before you expand.

The second mistake is not modeling enough. Many parents wait for the child to initiate, then prompt them to sign or use the device. Research on aided language stimulation shows the adult needs to model the modes continuously during natural activities, not only when the child is stuck [9]. Use the signs yourself. Point to the pictures yourself. Activate the AAC device yourself. Your child is learning by watching you.

The third mistake is inconsistency across caregivers. If one parent signs and the other does not, if grandma ignores the picture board, the child gets mixed signals about whether the system is worth the effort. This is hard to fix in extended families. It still matters.

The fourth is treating total communication as a phase to graduate from. Some parents frame it as a bridge: "we'll do signs until she talks, then stop." If speech comes in, great. Keep using signs alongside it for a while anyway. The modes reinforce each other. There is no downside to a child who can both talk and sign.

How does total communication overlap with echolalia and scripting?

Many late talkers and autistic children use echolalia, repeating words, phrases, or whole scripts they have heard. For a long time this was treated as a problem to extinguish. The current clinical view is different: echolalia is communicative. It is the child using the language tools they have.

Total communication works well alongside echolalia because it does not demand that the child drop what already works. If a child scripts a phrase from a cartoon to request something, you can honor that communication while also modeling the sign or picture symbol for the same request. You are adding options, not replacing the child's existing strategy.

Some children use scripted phrases as self-regulation rather than communication, and it can be hard to tell the difference. An SLP can help you read the context. Understanding echolalia meaning in your specific child's pattern is a useful first step.

Total communication gives echolalic children more routes to say novel things, which is usually the goal: helping a child move from scripted repetition to flexible, generative language.

How do I know if my child needs total communication or something more specific?

Total communication is a framework, not a diagnosis-specific protocol. Whether your child needs it, and in what form, depends on a proper evaluation.

A speech-language pathologist can do a standardized assessment to measure expressive and receptive language, oral motor function, and communication behavior. For children under 3, you can request a free evaluation through your state's early intervention program under IDEA Part C [8]. For children 3 and older, the school district is required to evaluate at no cost if you request it in writing under IDEA Part B [8].

Want a faster read on whether multimodal support might help? Ask yourself two questions. Does my child communicate clearly through any means other than speech, pointing, pulling, making sounds, showing? If yes, those are the foundations you build on. Does my child get frustrated when they cannot make themselves understood? That frustration is the signal that they have something to say and need more tools to say it.

Apps like Little Words can help you map your child's communication profile before or between therapy appointments. The quiz identifies specific gaps and suggests modes that match your child's current abilities.

For children with suspected apraxia of speech specifically, total communication with AAC is recommended as an addition to motor-based speech therapy, not a replacement for it. The distinction matters because apraxia requires specific motor practice that signs and pictures alone cannot provide [6].

What does a typical week of total communication look like for a family?

There is no single template, but here is a realistic picture for a family with a 2-year-old late talker who has just started working with an SLP.

Monday through Friday, during meals, the parent uses signs for 10 target words: MORE, ALL DONE, HELP, WANT, EAT, DRINK, and the names of four or five favorite foods. The picture board on the fridge shows those same items. Every time the child reaches, the parent names the item, signs it, and responds. That is total communication. It takes no extra time. It is folded into what the family was already doing.

During play, the parent models signs while narrating: BALL, THROW, FALL DOWN. The child is not expected to sign back right away. Input has to precede output by weeks or months in many children.

Once a week, the SLP session runs 45 minutes. The SLP introduces two or three new target words using a mix of speech, signs, and picture symbols, then coaches the parent on how to work them into home routines.

The parent also uses a simple AAC app during bath time to give the child practice activating symbols for WATER, BUBBLES, and DONE. The app provides auditory output (the device says the word), which reinforces the spoken form.

Over four to six months, the vocabulary set grows from 15 words to 50 to 80. Some children start combining two symbols (MORE BUBBLES) before they combine two spoken words. That is a real language milestone, even if it does not look like talking yet.

Frequently asked questions

At what age should I start total communication with my child?

As early as you notice a gap between what your child seems to understand and what they can express. There is no minimum age for adding signs or pictures alongside speech. Early intervention services under IDEA Part C are available from birth through age 2 and are free. Research on language development consistently favors earlier support over a wait-and-see approach for children with communication delays.

Will my child stop trying to talk if I introduce signs or AAC?

No. Multiple systematic reviews, including Schlosser and Wendt's meta-analysis of 27 studies, found no evidence that AAC or manual signs reduce speech output. In a subset of studies, speech actually increased after AAC was introduced. The fear that communication supports lower motivation to speak is not supported by the data.

Do I need to learn full ASL to do total communication at home?

No. Total communication uses a small set of signs paired with spoken English, not ASL as a standalone language. You might learn 20 to 50 signs covering your child's most-wanted words. Free resources like the Lifeprint ASL dictionary at Sacramento State are reliable. Consistency matters far more than fluency: use the same sign for the same word every time.

Does insurance cover total communication therapy?

Coverage varies widely. Medicaid covers speech-language pathology services for children with qualifying diagnoses in all states. Private insurers vary by state law and plan. IDEA guarantees free evaluations and services for eligible children under 3 (Part C) and school-age children (Part B). AAC devices may require a separate prior authorization; your SLP can write supporting documentation.

Is total communication the same as PECS?

No. PECS (Picture Exchange Communication System) is a specific, structured protocol developed by Bondy and Frost in which the child physically exchanges picture cards to make requests. It is one tool that fits within a total communication philosophy. Total communication is broader and includes signs, devices, gestures, and natural speech used at the same time rather than a staged picture-exchange protocol.

Can total communication help a child with autism who has some speech?

Yes, and it is often children with partial or inconsistent speech who benefit most. Autistic children with unreliable verbal output can use signs or AAC to fill the gaps without abandoning speech. Having a dependable backup mode cuts communication breakdowns and the frustration that comes with them. ASHA supports multimodal approaches across the autism spectrum, not only for minimally verbal children.

How long before I see results from total communication?

Most families see more communicative engagement, things like more eye contact, more reaching, more consistent attempts to signal, within four to eight weeks of consistent use. New word acquisition timelines vary widely by child. Input typically needs to precede output by weeks to months. If you have been consistent for three to four months and see no change at all, that is the signal to consult an SLP for a fuller evaluation.

What is the difference between total communication and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)?

AAC refers to the specific tools and strategies that supplement or replace spoken language, including devices, picture boards, and sign systems. Total communication is the broader philosophy that says you use all available modes, including natural speech, at the same time rather than treating speech as the only acceptable output. All AAC use can be part of total communication, but total communication is not limited to formal AAC tools.

Can siblings and grandparents participate in total communication?

Yes, and consistency across caregivers improves outcomes significantly. The more people in a child's environment who use and respond to the same signs and symbols, the stronger the signal that the system works. You do not need to teach the whole family ASL: a laminated sheet of 15 to 20 signs on the fridge is usually enough for extended family to join in meaningfully.

Is total communication used in schools?

Yes. Many special education classrooms use total communication, and an IEP can specify multimodal communication supports as a related service. Schools are required under IDEA to consider whether a child needs AAC as part of their free and appropriate public education. If you want total communication included in your child's school program, request it explicitly in writing during the IEP meeting.

Does total communication work for late talkers who have no diagnosis?

Yes. A formal diagnosis is not required to benefit from or begin total communication. Any child who struggles to express themselves verbally can benefit from more communication tools. If your child has no words or very few words at age 2, you can start adding signs and picture supports at home right away while you pursue an evaluation. Communication support does not require a diagnostic label first.

How is total communication different from watchful waiting?

Watchful waiting means monitoring a late talker without active intervention, on the assumption they may catch up on their own. Total communication takes the opposite stance: give the child communication tools now, because there is no demonstrated cost to doing so and potential benefit. The AAP and ASHA both advise against prolonged watchful waiting for children with persistent communication delays, favoring early support instead.

Sources

  1. ASHA, Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) practice portal: ASHA considers multimodal AAC approaches within evidence-based practice for children with complex communication needs; supports telepractice for pediatric speech-language services
  2. Millar DC, Light JC, Schlosser RW. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2006;49(2):248-264.: Systematic review found no evidence that AAC intervention reduced speech production; in several cases speech output increased after AAC was introduced
  3. Schlosser RW, Wendt O. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2008;51(5):1401-1417.: Meta-analysis of 27 studies found AAC does not suppress speech; in a subset of studies speech output increased after AAC introduction
  4. American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Children with Disabilities. Policy statement on AAC for children with complex communication needs.: AAP states AAC systems should be introduced early and that waiting for a child to 'be ready' for AAC is not supported by evidence
  5. ASHA, Late Language Emergence practice portal: Late talkers defined as children with fewer than 50 words by 24 months or no two-word combinations by 30 months
  6. ASHA, Childhood Apraxia of Speech practice portal: ASHA lists multimodal communication as a recommended support for childhood apraxia of speech alongside motor speech therapy
  7. Flippin M, Reszka S, Watson LR. Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on communication and speech for children with autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2010;19(2):178-195.: PECS has evidence of benefit for communication initiation in minimally verbal children with autism; effects on spoken language were variable
  8. U.S. Department of Education, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part C and Part B: IDEA Part C provides free early intervention evaluations and services for children birth through age 2; Part B covers school-age children; school districts must evaluate at no cost on written request
  9. Biggs EE, Carter EW, Gilson CB. Aided AAC modeling by peers. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2018;123(1):12-32.: Research on aided language stimulation shows that children need to see an adult or peer modeling the AAC system before they use it independently
  10. National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), Language and Linguistics overview: Earlier intervention for language delays fits evidence on neuroplasticity in language development during early childhood
Little Words is a talk-with-Buddy app built for kids like yours.

Buddy is a voice-first speech companion your child actually talks to, made for late talkers and neurodivergent kids. It is free to download on the App Store.

Download on the App Store